Yo, what’s up, Creedheads! Picking the *best* Assassin’s Creed is a total minefield, but here’s my take for 2025, factoring in both classics and new releases:
Top Tier: The Undisputed Champs
- Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag (2013): This game redefined naval combat. Seriously, the sailing, the ship upgrades, the treasure hunting – it’s legendary. Plus, Edward Kenway is a fantastic anti-hero. If you haven’t played it, you’re missing out.
- Assassin’s Creed Mirage (2023): A return to the series’ roots. Fast-paced parkour, focused assassinations, and a classic AC story. This one’s a must-have for fans who miss the stealth-focused gameplay of the older titles.
Contenders: Heavy Hitters You Shouldn’t Miss
- Assassin’s Creed Brotherhood (2010): Rome! Ezio’s at his best here, the city is breathtaking, and the mechanics are super polished. Definitely a classic.
- Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (2018): Ancient Greece is gorgeous, the RPG elements are addictive, and the choices you make genuinely impact the story. A bit less focused on stealth, but a massive, unforgettable experience.
- Assassin’s Creed Origins (2017): This game revamped the combat and RPG elements, laying the foundation for Odyssey and Valhalla. Ancient Egypt is stunning, and Bayek is a compelling protagonist. A must play for anyone who appreciates a more polished open-world RPG experience.
- Assassin’s Creed Valhalla (2020): Viking life, massive map, tons of content. It’s a beast of a game, but might feel a bit overwhelming for players who prefer a more streamlined experience. Definitely long-term value here.
Honorable Mentions:
- Assassin’s Creed (2007): The OG. A historical landmark, but the gameplay definitely shows its age. Worth experiencing for its historical significance and to see where it all began.
- Assassin’s Creed Shadows (2025): Still fresh on the scene, but early reviews are suggesting it’s a strong contender for a top spot in the franchise. Keep your eye on it!
Which Assassin’s Creed is better, Odyssey or Origins?
Okay, so Origins versus Odyssey…tough one. Both are massive, but they cater to different tastes. Origins, for me, wins on narrative. Bayek’s story, his relationship with Aya, the build-up to the Brotherhood – it’s just more emotionally resonant. The map, while smaller than Odyssey’s, feels more densely packed and varied. Ancient Egypt is incredibly well-realized. Plus, Origins does a better job of grounding the Assassin’s Creed lore in its historical setting, building the foundations of the Creed in a believable way. The RPG elements are there, but they aren’t overwhelming.
Odyssey, though? Man, the gameplay is just *slick*. The combat is more fluid, the skill trees offer insane customization options, and the sheer amount of content is staggering. You could easily sink hundreds of hours into it, exploring the Greek islands, completing side quests (many of which are surprisingly compelling), and uncovering all the hidden stuff. It’s a bit of a sprawling mess at times, but that chaos also lends itself to incredible replayability. The sheer number of choices and the impact they have on the world is a huge draw.
Ultimately, it comes down to preference. Do you prioritize a strong narrative and a more focused experience with a tighter connection to the overall Assassin’s Creed universe? Then Origins is your jam. Do you crave unparalleled freedom, a massive open world, and a ton of gameplay choices and customizations? Then Odyssey’s your pick. Both are amazing games, really. I’ve probably put in 200+ hours across both, and I don’t regret a single second.
What is considered the worst Assassin’s Creed game?
Declaring a single “worst” Assassin’s Creed game is subjective, dependent on individual preferences and priorities. However, consistent criticism and community consensus place certain titles lower in overall rankings. While “worst” is relative, several entries consistently appear near the bottom of many “best of” lists. Assassin’s Creed Unity (2014), plagued by significant launch issues, frequently features in such discussions. Its technical problems overshadowed its setting and story, impacting the overall player experience. Similarly, Assassin’s Creed Syndicate (2015), while visually appealing, often receives criticism for its repetitive gameplay and underdeveloped narrative. The rope-based traversal, while novel, didn’t fully compensate for these shortcomings. The shift in gameplay focus evident in games like Assassin’s Creed Valhalla (2020) and Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (2018), moving towards RPG elements, hasn’t resonated with all fans. These titles, lauded by some for their scope and world-building, are criticized by others for diluting the core stealth-action mechanics that define the franchise. The sheer size of Valhalla’s map, for example, is often cited as a detriment, leading to a feeling of emptiness and a lack of focus. Even seemingly well-received entries like Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag (2013), while enjoying widespread praise for its naval combat, sometimes fall short due to a narrative that, for some, loses its connection to the core Assassin’s Creed storyline. Ultimately, the “worst” Assassin’s Creed game remains a matter of debate, but the aforementioned titles consistently feature in discussions regarding the franchise’s weaker entries, largely due to technical issues, narrative flaws, or significant shifts from the established gameplay formula.
What’s the best order to play Assassin’s Creed?
Yo what’s up assassins! Best way to play the Creed? Chronologically, baby! It’s the ultimate experience. We’re talking a sprawling epic spanning millennia. First up, Odyssey and Origins – these are your ancient Greece and Egypt adventures. Gorgeous worlds, epic stories, and a ton of RPG elements to get lost in. Origins especially sets the tone for the hidden blade’s origins. Then, it’s a bit of a jump to Mirage, a back-to-basics stealth-focused adventure in Baghdad – think a more refined take on the original. Next, Valhalla, a Viking saga, HUGE open world, and loads of side activities, Prepare for a long one! After that we hit the OG, Assassin’s Creed 1 (1191) – the game that started it all, a little rough around the edges now, but historically significant. Finally, we cap it off with Ezio’s trilogy: Assassin’s Creed II, Brotherhood, and Revelations (not listed in your original order, but chronologically they follow). This is peak Assassin’s Creed: amazing storytelling, memorable characters, and the peak of the series’s Renaissance-era atmosphere.
Important note: While chronological is the best for narrative flow, some might find the older games’ gameplay a bit dated. Don’t let that scare you though – each game has its charm. This order ensures the story unfolds as intended, revealing the lineage and evolution of the Assassin-Templar conflict. Enjoy the ride!
Should I play Valhalla or Odyssey?
Odyssey boasts a superior narrative, a sprawling, captivating story that will keep you hooked. Its choices matter more, significantly impacting the overarching plot. Valhalla, while fun, offers a more fragmented narrative experience. Think of it this way: Odyssey is a finely crafted novel, Valhalla a collection of compelling short stories within a larger, less cohesive framework.
Combat: Odyssey features a more fluid and versatile combat system. The sheer number of abilities and the emphasis on stealth make it incredibly rewarding to master. Valhalla’s combat is more visceral and brutal, leaning heavily into its Viking setting, but feels less nuanced and less adaptable in the long run. Veteran PvP players will find more depth and options in Odyssey’s system.
World Design: Both games are massive open worlds, but their designs differ greatly. Odyssey’s world feels more alive and organically designed, with a greater sense of discovery. Valhalla, while visually stunning, often feels more segmented and less richly detailed. This difference is crucial for long-term engagement.
RPG elements: Odyssey offers deeper RPG mechanics. Character progression feels more meaningful and impactful. The skill tree is more extensive and allows for diverse builds, significantly affecting your playstyle. Valhalla’s RPG elements are more streamlined, offering less freedom in customization.
Ultimately: For a compelling, narrative-focused experience with superior combat depth and RPG mechanics, Odyssey is the superior choice, especially for a PvP veteran seeking strategic depth. Valhalla is still a solid game, but its strengths lie elsewhere – specifically, in its Viking aesthetic and more straightforward combat. The choice depends on your priorities.
Is Valhalla a sequel to Odyssey?
No, Valhalla isn’t a direct sequel in the narrative sense like Odyssey to Origins. Think of it more as a spiritual successor, sharing the RPG elements and open-world exploration but offering a distinct story and setting.
Key Differences & Similarities:
- Setting: Odyssey is ancient Greece; Valhalla is Viking-age England and Norway.
- Gameplay: Both feature vast open worlds, RPG mechanics (skill trees, dialogue choices, loot), and naval combat, but Valhalla leans more heavily into RPG systems with a greater emphasis on settlement building and gear management.
- Narrative Focus: While both games deal with the Isu and the ongoing Assassin-Templar conflict, the narratives are largely independent. Odyssey focuses on the legendary Peloponnesian War, while Valhalla centers on a Viking’s settlement and conquest of England.
Important Note: While not directly connected narratively in a linear way, there are some subtle links and Easter eggs tying the two games together for eagle-eyed players. Think of them as existing in the same universe but telling separate, equally compelling stories within the Assassin’s Creed timeline.
Chronologically: Valhalla takes place considerably later than Odyssey, approximately 872 AD vs. 431 BC, further highlighting their relative independence as main titles in the saga.
- Pro Tip: If you’re looking for a direct narrative follow-up to Odyssey, you might find more satisfaction playing through Legacy of the First Blade and The Fate of Atlantis, Odyssey’s DLC storylines which delve deeper into the overarching narrative.
- Pro Tip: Playing Odyssey isn’t strictly *required* before Valhalla. They can be enjoyed separately.
How long is Valhalla after Odyssey?
So, you’re wondering how long Valhalla is after Odyssey? Well, it depends on your playstyle. A straight shot through the main story will clock in around 61 hours. That’s just hitting the major beats, though. Think of it as a speedrun, no distractions.
Now, if you’re a completionist like me, buckle up. We’re talking 148 hours to really exhaust everything Valhalla throws at you. That’s everything: all side quests, mysteries, world events, even finding every single collectible. And that doesn’t even include the post-launch content – that adds considerable time.
Odyssey, by comparison, tends to run a bit longer for 100% completion, often pushing past 150 hours, but the core narrative is also more substantial. Valhalla focuses more on exploration and less on the intricate narrative threads of Odyssey’s main questline, making it feel shorter on a surface level despite the large world.
Consider this: Odyssey’s world felt massive because of the sheer density of activities in every area. Valhalla spreads its content across a larger, but perhaps less densely populated map. You’ll still spend a lot of time exploring, but the pacing is subtly different. Ultimately, it comes down to what you prioritize. Do you prefer story, or complete exploration?
Who is the weakest assassin creed?
While many Assassin’s Creed protagonists possess unique strengths, Eivor’s position as the weakest is a compelling argument stemming from several key gameplay and lore mechanics. Let’s analyze this.
Firstly, Eivor’s combat proficiency, while effective in the context of Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, pales in comparison to other assassins. Their noticeably slower attack speed and pronounced vulnerability to even minor enemy attacks severely hinder their effectiveness in direct confrontation. This starkly contrasts with agile assassins like Altaïr or Ezio, known for their swiftness and precision.
Secondly, Eivor’s role within the overarching Assassin narrative deviates significantly. Unlike previous protagonists who directly eliminate tyrannical leaders, Eivor primarily serves as a political influencer, strategically placing individuals on the thrones of various kingdoms. While this contributes to a broader, long-term effect, it lacks the direct, decisive action typically associated with the Creed’s assassinations.
Gameplay mechanics further highlight this weakness. Eivor’s reliance on heavy weaponry and less emphasis on stealth compared to other assassins points towards a more brute-force approach, a divergence from the traditional assassin’s preferred tactics of subtlety and elimination from the shadows.
Finally, considering the long-term impact, while Eivor’s actions undoubtedly shifted the political landscape, the long-term effects are less direct compared to assassinations that instantly removed oppressive rulers. It’s a different form of influence, arguably less effective in the immediate sense.
Which map is bigger Assassin’s Creed Odyssey or origins?
So, Odyssey vs. Origins map size, right? A lot of people wonder about this. Odyssey’s Greece clocks in at around 130 square kilometers. That’s a massive leap from Origins’ Egypt, which is roughly 80 square kilometers. We’re talking more than 2.5 times bigger!
Now, keep in mind that the 130km² figure for Odyssey is based on in-game footage analysis – not official figures. There’s always a margin of error with these calculations. But even with that caveat, it’s still a seriously huge difference.
Key takeaway: Odyssey’s map is significantly larger, offering a lot more exploration. Think about it – more islands to discover, more hidden locations, more ancient ruins to stumble upon. While Origins’ Egypt offered a fantastic experience, Odyssey’s sprawling map is a genuine game-changer in terms of scale.
Pro-tip: Don’t just focus on raw square kilometers. Consider the density of content. Both games pack a lot into their respective maps, but Odyssey’s sheer size allows for a more sprawling and varied landscape.
Who is the deadliest assassin creed?
Defining the “deadliest” Assassin is tricky, as it depends on your criteria: raw combat skill, strategic brilliance, sheer number of kills, or impact on history. However, a compelling ranking considering these factors might look like this:
1. Altaïr Ibn-La’Ahad (Assassin’s Creed): The founder of the modern Assassin Brotherhood’s creed, Altaïr’s journey shows unparalleled growth in both skill and wisdom. His mastery of the Assassin’s arts, coupled with his strategic mind, made him incredibly effective, culminating in a pivotal role in shaping the Brotherhood’s future.
2. Ezio Auditore da Firenze (Assassin’s Creed II, Brotherhood, Revelations): Ezio’s longevity and experience make him a strong contender. He honed his skills across decades, mastering various fighting styles and weaponry. His influence on the Assassin Brotherhood, spanning generations, significantly shapes the franchise.
3. Edward Kenway (Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag): While initially a pirate driven by greed, Edward’s evolution into a dedicated Assassin showcases incredible adaptability. His prowess in naval combat and his ruthlessness in close quarters make him a formidable foe.
4. Kassandra (Assassin’s Creed Odyssey): Kassandra’s exceptional combat skills and nearly unmatched survival abilities in ancient Greece are remarkable. Her strength lies not just in her fighting prowess, but also her strategic thinking and adaptability, allowing her to overcome seemingly impossible odds.
5. Eivor (Assassin’s Creed Valhalla): Eivor’s combat style, blending Viking ferocity with Assassin precision, makes them a powerful and versatile warrior. Their ability to lead and inspire others adds another dimension to their lethality. Their tactical brilliance and strength make them a force to be reckoned with.
6. Jacob Frye (Assassin’s Creed Syndicate): Jacob’s aggressive and brutal fighting style, coupled with his leadership and knack for urban warfare, made him a terror in Victorian London. His proficiency in gang warfare and close-quarters combat solidifies his place among the deadliest.
7. Evie Frye (Assassin’s Creed Syndicate): Evie’s more strategic and stealth-oriented approach complements Jacob’s brutality. Her mastery of stealth, combined with her lethal efficiency, makes her a silent but deadly assassin.
8. Adéwalé (Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag, Freedom Cry): Adewale’s experience as both a pirate and Assassin provides him with a unique blend of skills. His unwavering commitment and tactical brilliance make him a fearsome opponent.
What is the best assassin’s creed to start with?
So, best Assassin’s Creed to start with? Tough question, but I’ve sunk hundreds of hours into the series, so let me give you the seasoned gamer’s perspective.
8. Assassin’s Creed (Altaïr’s story): Yeah, it’s older, the mechanics are clunky compared to later entries. But it’s where it all began! The atmosphere is fantastic, and experiencing the origins of the Creed is surprisingly rewarding. Think of it as a historical documentary with really cool assassination sequences. It’s short too, a great way to dip your toes in.
7. Assassin’s Creed III: A fun, streamlined experience. It’s a solid stepping stone to the more modern games. The setting, revolutionary-era America, is beautiful and surprisingly unique for the series. Combat is a bit more straightforward, which is nice for beginners.
6. Assassin’s Creed Unity: This one gets a lot of hate for its initial buggy release, but the patched version is surprisingly smooth. The parkour is fantastic—truly next-level fluid movement—and Paris is stunningly recreated. It’s a bit darker in tone than some others.
5. Assassin’s Creed Mirage: This is a return to the core gameplay that many veterans crave. Think of it as a refined, streamlined version of Assassin’s Creed 2 with modern quality of life improvements. If you want a more pure assassin experience, this is a great place to start.
4. Assassin’s Creed II: The best overall starting point for most players. It’s a fantastic blend of compelling story, engaging characters (Ezio is iconic for a reason), and refined gameplay mechanics. It’s the game that truly perfected the formula. It’s longer than some of the others listed, but it’s worth the investment.
What is the chronological order of Assassin’s Creed games?
Chronological Assassin’s Creed Timeline: A Gamer’s Perspective
Let’s break down the Assassin’s Creed games in their historical order, a crucial aspect for any serious Creed fan. This isn’t just a linear progression; it’s a sprawling narrative across centuries. Think of it as a massive eSports tournament spanning millennia!
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (431 B.C.–422 B.C.): Kicking things off in ancient Greece, this epic entry features branching storylines and choices impacting the meta-narrative. Think of it as the “wild card” round of the tournament – unpredictable and hugely influential.
Assassin’s Creed Origins (49 B.C.–44 B.C.): Shifting to Ptolemaic Egypt, Origins establishes the core Creed lore with a polished combat system. Consider this the “qualifiers” – setting the stage for the main event.
Assassin’s Creed Mirage (861–???): A return to the series’ roots, focusing on Basim Ibn Ishaq. This one’s the “play-in” game – a crucial stepping stone in understanding the overall storyline. The exact end date is shrouded in mystery, adding to the anticipation.
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla (872–878): The Viking age! Valhalla expands the gameplay with raids and settlement building. Think of this as a significant “group stage” match, showcasing the breadth of the franchise.
Assassin’s Creed (1191): The original game, the “first round” of the championship! It laid the foundation, introducing the core mechanics and setting the scene for the epic saga to come.
Assassin’s Creed II (1476–1499): This is where the story really shines. Ezio Auditore da Firenze’s journey is legendary. This acts as the “semifinals” – a crucial point in the overall narrative.
Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood (1499–1507): A direct sequel to ACII, following Ezio’s continued fight. This is the “final” before the grand finale – an intensely exciting phase!
Which AC has the biggest map?
For those seeking the largest explorable area in the Assassin’s Creed universe, the answer is surprisingly nuanced. While raw numbers can be misleading, let’s break down the map sizes, considering both land and sea:
- AC Rogue: North Atlantic – 70km² – A relatively compact map focusing on naval combat and smaller land sections in New York and the River.
- AC Origins: Egypt – 80km² (landmass only) – A beautifully rendered, yet comparatively smaller map focusing on the dense geography of Egypt. Consider the verticality; climbing pyramids adds a significant dimension not captured in pure square kilometers.
- AC Valhalla: England – 94km² (landmass only), 120km² (sea included) – A significant landmass, but remember that much of the sea is less interactively explorable compared to Black Flag’s open ocean.
- AC Black Flag: Caribbean – 235km² – This holds the title for largest *landmass* in many peoples’ minds. However, the true size needs further qualification.
- AC Odyssey: Greece – 130km² (landmass only), 256km² (sea included) – While boasting a larger total area including sea, the explorable landmass is smaller than Black Flag’s. The vast Aegean Sea makes this a powerful contender for “largest playable area” for some fans.
Key Considerations:
- Sea vs. Land: Black Flag and Odyssey’s massive sea areas heavily inflate their total size. Landmass-focused gameplay might prioritize different titles.
- Verticality: Games like Origins and Valhalla feature significant vertical exploration (climbing, exploring buildings), which isn’t fully reflected in the 2D map size.
- Density: A smaller map packed with points of interest and activities can feel larger than a bigger, emptier one.
Conclusion: While Black Flag often claims the crown, Odyssey and Valhalla provide stiff competition depending on how you weigh landmass versus overall explorable area, and whether activities and verticality contribute to your sense of scale. The “biggest” is subjective.
Which Assassin’s Creed was the most popular?
Defining “most popular” is tricky; it depends on whether you’re looking at sales figures, critical acclaim, or player engagement. However, several Assassin’s Creed titles consistently rank highly across these metrics.
Assassin’s Creed II is frequently cited as a fan favorite, revitalizing the series with its compelling protagonist, Ezio Auditore da Firenze, and a richer, more engaging narrative. Its setting in Renaissance Italy also proved incredibly popular.
Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag shifted the gameplay significantly, introducing naval combat that proved immensely successful and broadened the series’ appeal beyond its core stealth mechanics. The pirate setting was a fresh and exciting departure.
Assassin’s Creed Origins marked a significant gameplay shift, incorporating RPG elements and a much larger, more open world. While divisive among longtime fans, its success is undeniable, establishing a new formula for subsequent entries.
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and Valhalla, both boasting massive open worlds and RPG mechanics, achieved considerable commercial success, though their sprawling nature and diluted focus on the core tenets of the series drew criticism from some.
More recent releases like Assassin’s Creed Mirage aim for a return to the series’ roots, focusing on tighter, more focused gameplay reminiscent of the earlier titles. Its success in reviving that classic feel remains to be seen in terms of long-term popularity, though initial reception has been positive.
Ultimately, the “most popular” Assassin’s Creed game is subjective. However, the titles mentioned above consistently appear in discussions of the best and most influential games in the franchise, demonstrating enduring appeal across different aspects of player engagement.
How old is Ezio in Brotherhood?
Ezio’s in his early 40s in Brotherhood. That’s a pretty significant age jump from Assassin’s Creed II, where we follow him from a rebellious teenager at 17 all the way to his early 40s. Brotherhood picks up right where ACII left off – no time skip whatsoever, so you’re seeing the seasoned veteran Ezio, much more experienced and battle-hardened. Think of the difference in his gameplay – his fighting style has evolved substantially, reflecting his years of experience. He’s not just a cocky young man anymore; he’s a master assassin at the peak of his powers. It’s a really interesting character arc to see played out, showing the impact of years spent fighting the Templars.
Worth noting: This older Ezio is also a significantly different character in terms of mission design, his interactions with other characters, and even the overall tone of the game. The game’s narrative reflects his maturity and the weight of his past actions. So you’re getting a very distinct gameplay and story experience compared to ACII.
Who is the deadliest Assassin creed?
Defining the “deadliest” Assassin is subjective, hinging on interpretations of combat prowess, influence, and overall impact on the Assassin-Templar conflict. While raw strength varies across titles, several Assassins consistently stand out. Altaïr Ibn-La’Ahad, the series’ progenitor, embodies early Assassin techniques, demonstrating remarkable adaptability and strategic brilliance, though his skills were refined over decades. Edward Kenway, while initially driven by piracy, evolved into a formidable Assassin, showcasing exceptional naval combat skills alongside his land-based prowess. Ezio Auditore da Firenze, a fan favorite, transcends mere combat; his mastery of both blade and intellect, coupled with his enduring legacy, solidified his position as a cornerstone of the franchise. Eivor Varinsdottir, though from a different era and with a distinct playstyle emphasizing brutal force and cunning, undeniably displays terrifying combat potential and leadership. Jacob and Evie Frye, twin Assassins from Victorian London, offer a unique perspective with their contrasting approaches – Jacob favoring aggressive, crowd-clearing tactics and Evie employing stealth and subterfuge. Adéwalé, a former slave turned Assassin, boasts impressive skills honed through years of experience and a relentless determination. Finally, Kassandra, a Spartan warrior with centuries of combat experience and a powerful arsenal, boasts seemingly superhuman capabilities. The “deadliest” title is not easily assigned; each Assassin represents a peak of skills within their respective time periods and environments, making objective comparison difficult.
